Digital Archives Initiative
Memorial University - Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5
menu off  add document to favorites : add page to favorites : reference url back to results : previous : next
 
 Search this object:
  
 0 hit(s) :: previous hit : next hit
  View:    
  previous page : next page
Document Description
TitleEvaluation of the implementation of an electronic occurrence reporting system at Eastern Health, Newfoundland and Labrador (Phase One)
AuthorElliott, Pamela G. (Pamela Gale)
DescriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2010. Medicine
Date2010
Paginationxv, 272 leaves : ill. (some col.)
SubjectEastern Health (N.L.); Medical informatics--Newfoundland and Labrador; Medical records--Data processing; Medical records--Management--Newfoundland and Labrador
Subject.MESHAutomatic Data Processing--Newfoundland and Labrador; Medical Informatics--Newfoundland and Labrador; Medical Records--Newfoundland and Labrador; Risk Management--Newfoundland and Labrador
DegreePh.D.
Degree GrantorMemorial University of Newfoundland. Faculty of Medicine
DisciplineMedicine
LanguageEng
Spatial CoverageCanada--Newfoundland and Labrador
NotesBibliography: leaves 191-198.
AbstractEvaluation of the Implementation of an Electronic Occurrence Reporting System at Eastern Health, Newfoundland and Labrador (Phase One) -- In June 2008, Eastern Health completed the implementation of an electronic occurrence reporting system (Phase One). Phase One included a pre-go-live site (an integrated services site in a rural setting) and three go-live sites (acute care, long term care and community health in an urban setting). The evaluation study had a dual purpose: (a) to assess and report on the impact of the implementation of the electronic occurrence reporting system on achieving its stated objectives, particularly those that could be measured within the timelines of the project and (b) to analyze findings to identify contributions to the literature in the recently developing field of implementations of electronic occurrence reporting systems in health care. -- The evaluation was guided by the framework outlined in the report, "Towards an Evaluation Framework for Electronic Health Records Initiatives" (Neville et al., 2004), which emphasizes stakeholder involvement in evaluation studies, pre/post comparative study design, and triangulation of data where possible. Data were collected from several sources such as project documentation, administrative occurrence reporting records, surveys, focus groups and key informant interviews. -- The findings of this study provide evidence that frontline staff and managers support the implementation of the electronic occurrence reporting system, that there is little difference in results between the various sectors of the continuum of health services and the new system had both positive and negative impacts on the role of frontline managers. There were limitations related to some of the findings due to the small sample size, particularly the long term care sector. -- Many benefits were realized such as: (a) an increase in the number of occurrences reported, (b) increase in the number of occurrences reported within 48 hours, (c) increase in the number of occurrences reported by staff other than registered nurses, (d) increase in the number of close calls reported, (e) positive changes in the patient safety culture, (f) improved timelines for notification of high alert occurrences to managers, and (g) satisfaction with the electronic tool related to ease of use, accessibility, and consistency. -- The implementation process also encountered challenges, such as issues related to customizing the software and development of the classification system for coding occurrences. These issues impacted on the ability of the managers to obtain timely customized reports and to close out files. These challenges are currently being addressed by the Project Implementation Team. Participants noted that resolving these issues will enhance the many positive impacts of the system already realized. Lessons learned during the Phase One implementation process (including the identification of facilitators and barriers) resulted in recommendations that can assist with future implementations.
TypeText
Resource TypeElectronic thesis or dissertation
FormatImage/jpeg; Application/pdf
SourcePaper copy kept in the Centre for Newfoundland Studies, Memorial University Libraries
Local Identifiera3506845
RightsThe author retains copyright ownership and moral rights in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's permission.
CollectionElectronic Theses and Dissertations
Scanning StatusCompleted
PDF File(8.93 MB) -- http://collections.mun.ca/PDFs/theses/Elliott_Pamela.pdf
CONTENTdm file name6359.cpd